ABSTRACT
Electroporation has been the method of election for transfection of murine embryonic stem cells for over 15 years; however, it is a time consuming protocol because it requires large amounts of DNA and cells, as well as expensive and delicate equipment. Lipofection is a transfection method that requires lower amounts of cells and DNA than electroporation, and has proven to be efficient in a large number of cell lines. It has been shown that after lipofection, mouse embryonic stem cells remain pluripotent, capable of forming germ line chimeras and can be transfected with greater efficiency than with electroporation; however, gene targeting of mouse embryonic stem cells by lipofection has not been reported. The objective of this work was to find out if lipofection can be used as efficiently as electroporation for regular gene targeting protocols. This context compares gene targeting efficiency between these techniques in mouse embryonic stem cells E14TG2a, using a gene replacement type vector. No differences were found in gene targeting efficiency between groups; however, lipofection was three times more efficient than electroporation in transfection efficiency, which makes lipofection a less expensive alternative method to produce gene targeting in mouse embryonic stem cells.
Durante los últimos 15 años se ha demostrado que la electroporación representa el método ideal para la transfección de células troncoembrionarias de ratón; sin embargo, demanda grandes cantidades de ADN y células, así como equipo caro y delicado, ello hace que este proceso sea costoso y laborioso. La lipofección es un método de transfección que requiere menos de células y ADN que la electroporación; asimismo, ha probado ser eficiente en gran número de líneas celulares. Se ha demostrado que después de lipofectar células troncoembrionarias de ratón, éstas mantienen su pluripotencia y son capaces de formar quimeras de línea germinal y se transfectan con mayor eficiencia que con electroporación, pero no se ha notificado la mutagénesis dirigida mediante la lipofección de células troncoembrionarias de ratón. El objetivo del presente trabajo fue saber si la lipofección puede ser utilizada con la misma o mayor eficiencia que la electroporación para los protocolos regulares de mutagénesis dirigida; en este contexto, se compara la eficiencia en mutagénesis dirigida entre estas técnicas en células troncoembrionarias de ratón E14TG2a, utilizando un vector de reemplazo. Entre las células transfectadas no se hallan diferencias en la eficiencia en mutagénesis dirigida entre grupos; sin embargo, los resultados que aquí se ofrecen muestran que la lipofección es tres veces más eficiente en la transfección, lo cual indica que la lipofección es un método alternativo menos costoso para obtener mutagénesis dirigida en células troncoembrionarias de ratón.
ABSTRACT
The polymorphism of locus BoLA-DRB3.2 of the Major Histocompatibility Complex was evaluated in two northern Mexican Creole cattle populations, Chihuahua (n = 47) and Tamaulipas (n = 51). The BoLA-DRB3.2 locus was typed by amplification and digestion with restriction endonuclease enzymes (PCR-RFLP). Fifty-two alleles were detected (28 previously reported and 24 new ones). In the Chihuahua population, 18 alleles and 5.5 effective alleles were found, while in the Tamaulipas population there were 34 and 10.8, respectively. The allele frequencies ranged from 0.011 to 0.383 in Chihuahua and from 0.010 to 0.206 in Tamaulipas. The frequencies of the new alleles in both cattle populations were low (0.010 to 0.053). The expected heterozygosity was 0.827 and 0.916, respectively, for the Chihuahua and Tamaulipas populations. Both populations presented a heterozygote deficit: [Chihuahua FIS = 0.1 (p = 0.019) and Tamaulipas FIS = 0.317 (p < 0.001)]. In conclusion, this study showed that the Mexican Creole cattle have many low-frequency alleles, several of which are exclusive to these populations. Genetic distances obtained show that the Mexican Creole cattle population is composed of independent populations, far apart from other South American Creole populations.